As of July 3rd, day 35 of the meet there have been 269 races run. Total starters are 1914. The total amount of different runners is 636 including 49 two year olds that have run at least once. The field size has slipped as of late to 7.12. The total handle to date is $14,409,888. The average handle per race is $53,475. Adding to the above there were 377 different owners that have had at least one start with a horse so far this meet. The leading owners half way are Glen Todd and Patrick Kinsella with 35 wins. Swift Thoroughbreds are second with 13 wins.
Last year we ran 538 races and 38 stakes. This year we have budgeted for 539 races and 41 stakes. At the half way mark we are 14 races short when compared to the coresponding date last year. I hope that those races can be made up somewhere during the remainder of the meet.Even better extend the meet to at least Thanksgiving, October 10th.
The handle figure indicated above is off about 7.80% but when you factor in 14 missed races then we see a different picture. Now we are down just 3%. I find this to be quite remarkable considering the bad weather, the horse owner/shortage and having to go head to head with several scheduled events. The purse account is in good shape with a surplus. But remember we don’t want it on the plus side come the last day of the meet……….we want it flat meaning all purse money available for 2011 was paid out to owners.
Last Friday’s racing handle was not good and this was in spite of the fact that the crowd for the holiday racing day was really quite large. Why this was is difficult to pinpoint. Last year, July 1st fell on a Thursday but both Hollywood and Emerald Downs had evening post times. This year both tracks also had evening starts. There were 9 races last year with three stakes races as opposed to two this year. This year we had two 5 horse fields but so did we last year. Is it possible that the young crowds that we now attract just do not wager like we would like? That would explain why our live bet was off this year.
Last Friday’s racing handle was not good and this was in spite of the fact that the crowd for the holiday racing day was really quite large. Why this was is difficult to pinpoint. Last year, July 1st fell on a Thursday but both Hollywood and Emerald Downs had evening post times. This year both tracks also had evening starts. There were 9 races last year with three stakes races as opposed to two this year. This year we had two 5 horse fields but so did we last year. Is it possible that the young crowds that we now attract just do not wager like we would like? That would explain why our live bet was off this year.
Finally and this talks to a previous blog which I wrote with regards to our “Racing Secretary”. If on a Monday through communication from trainers, or jockey agents, Paul would have had a better idea of horses ready to run then perhaps he would have been able to write two different races other than race one and two last Friday which both went with 5 horse fields. So far this year we have run 25 of these short field races. This is awful. Now I am well aware that sometimes we need to run a race for owners rather than have their horses sit in the barn. This is important. Scratches also happen and this is a part of racing. But if with very little effort we were able to cut back on just 20 5 horse fields during a meet it would make a material difference. Here’s the math. Running 20 races with 7 horse fields instead of 5 would increase the handle per race by approximately $9,000. You would gain on the mutual pools and the triactor and exactor bets. Also you would now gain back the superfecta bet that you lose with a 5 horse field. That is another $6,000. So that is approximately $300,000 over a year. Now it adds up. It certainly is worth trying and if it does not work out try something different. But what I do know is that there is one thing worse than trying and failing and that is not trying at all. We have an owner/horse population problem. We need to deal with it! Let us at least become highly efficient with what we do have.
One last point. I am hopeful as more and more two year olds come back to the track and are made ready for the races late July that this will help take some of the slack off from the older horses. We will need a lot of help on BC Cup Day in August. So far to date 158 winners or 59% of all races run have been won by BC Breds.
And now once again I am going to harp with regards to the Standardbred situation. Next year they will run 82 days over 10 months. The two months they will not run is undecided nor which days of the week. The Standardbred people have asked for Fridays and Sundays. This is in spite of the fact that their handle is down dramatically. My point in all of this is that I as a thoroughbred owner will not accept one day less of racing next year. For every 4 days that are cut, an owner loses 1 potential start. On the contrary I would like to see the meet run to mid-October and gain the same amount of days as the Standardbreds which is six. So as a minimum I am looking for a 77 day meet next year. I have requested much more information on this matter from the “powers to be” and will expect to hear back from them shortly.
Stay Tuned. You all may be very surprised at what I have to say on this topic in a future blog.
Michael R Bye
G&G Stable
G&G Stable
Michael makes some excellent points, with which I agree. Something that is touched upon, but not explored deeply, is that the "young people of today" are not betting much, which is reflected in the decreased handles. My observation has been that they don't necessarily know how to bet or how to read a racing form. Casinos in Vegas, for instance, have the idea: when it's relatively quiet in the morning, they offer lessons on how to play the various games. This translates into the rookies coming back later in the evening to play confidently for longer, with larger wagers. Why not do the same at Hastings on a regular basis and advertise this in the Van. Sun and on the radio? Hold sessions 2 hours before the races start on how to read a form and how to correctly bet (mutuels tellers will love this!) everything from $20 WPS to $2 x 4 horse exactor boxes. Give prizes. Make it fun! Offer 1/2 off lunch coupons for Jeromes, etc. Just a suggestion, but maybe it would help.
ReplyDeleteLong Time Racing Fan
The handle averaged roughly $25,000 @ race day. Back in the days of real racing we averaged 35 to 60K days w/4d of racing, not including big wk ends Sarratoga has 2000 head and says they don't have enough horses for a 5 day meet. We have what ? 800?? It is not hard to see the problem. Short fields = sudden death. When there is an outstanding favorite plus a short field, even experienced bettors don't bet.
ReplyDeleteBack in the real days of racing Diamond had extra stables on his team. He had his Jewish club plus an abundance of owners and trainers that owed him favors. A friend in need is a friend in deed. This is how he filled his short races and produced a good card. This, in the days when we had enough horses. In small meets, eg: interior & trout springs people get together with the racing sec to make a card for the day. These guys all own their own horse so answer to nobody. It is okay to put your horse in what ever race works. Just wait for post time.
Our trainers have to honor their owners goals and their horses. This interest comes first, filling races second. When there was a good horse population,the racing secretary needed controlled stables to draw entries from. It is more obvious now that this is still needed.
Back in the days of real racing, the human out cry at Hastings was the favorites in the backstretch got favors. The real story was the favorites owed favors. The problem with this arrangement is the questions of doubt for honest gambling. Glen Todd tries harder to keep us going. He has multiple trainers. We need a bunch of Glen Todd's. There is an answer in this somewhere. A track has a stable under their control to fill races?? Hockey teams buy players from all over the country to make a team?? Some track horses are commissioned to each training stable for the sole purpose of filling races?? One thing for sure; the back stretch has to be more of a team effort and we need more horse.
I have been a breeder, trainer since 1964. For the last 10 years, I had 11 broodmares and did not do to bad racing. All sold, I have on left that I can't even give away because she is a young unproven mare. I'm done. These last tough years tapped me out. I have a nice 3yr old at home but he is staying in the field. I almost sold him as a jumper but said no just in case I go back nxt year.??? Racing survived the depression and I guess it will survive this. I feel like I am 1/2 a person without racing. I miss the other half of me.Thanks for the Blog
Davianna Farm Best regards Judith Coghlan
Michael you are right about the young people not betting last Friday. My observation is this: It seems it has become quite the thing to do for a fairly large group/groups of young people to come out to the races on Friday nights wearing their hats. I really enjoy seeing this resurgence of "retro attire" the young people should be commended for it as well as rewarded. Maybe in such a way that they would be randomly chosen to join in a winners circle presentation? anyways...my mom and sisters wanted to come to the races on Canada Day. I mentioned to them ...Hey, lets all wear our hats! it's a new trend and all the young people are doing it. I must admit ...we looked marvelous! although when we got the track I noticed there were hardly any people wearing hats. The trendy young people just wern't there!
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of Hats...I have often thought what a great marketing idea. Set up a kiosk on site with a wide selection of hats in preparation for "Hat Day at the Races" or Derby Day as well as the BC Oaks
ReplyDeleteIn response to not enough horses being purchased
ReplyDeleteoutside of b. c. part of the reason is that 25%
of the advertized purse is paid to b c breds
not much incentive to bring horses here to race.